Disagreeing about Disagreement: How Conflict in Social Networks Affects Political Behavior
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Disagreeing about Disagreement: How Conflict in Social Networks Affects Political Behavior
At the center of debates on deliberative democracy is the issue of how much deliberation citizens experience in their social networks. These “disagreements about disagreement” come in a variety of forms, with scholars advocating different empirical approaches (e.g., Huckfeldt, Johnson, and Sprague 2004; Mutz 2006) and coming to different substantive conclusions. We address these discrepancies b...
متن کاملDisagreeing About What We Disagree About
Two studies examined misperceptions of disagreement in partisan social conflicts, namely, in the debates over abortion (Study 1) and politics (Study 2). We observed that partisans tend to exaggerate differences of opinion with their adversaries. Further, we found that perceptions of disagreement were more pronounced for values that were central to the perceiver’s own ideology than for values th...
متن کاملPersistence of disagreement in social networks
Citation Acemoglu, Daron, Giacomo Como, Fabio Fagnani, and Asuman Ozdaglar. "Persistence of Disagreement in Social Networks." in Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems, (MTNS 2010), Systems on Graphs (Regular Session), Budapest, Hungary, July 5-9, 2010. As Published http://www.conferences.hu/mtns2010/List_of_Abstracts.pdf Publisher Compute...
متن کاملOpinion Fluctuations and Disagreement in Social Networks
We study a tractable opinion dynamics model that generates long-run disagreements and persistent opinion fluctuations. Our model involves a inhomogeneous stochastic gossip process of continuous opinion dynamics in a society consisting of two types of agents: regular agents, who update their beliefs according to information that they receive from their social neighbors; and stubborn agents, who ...
متن کاملFluctuations and Disagreement in Social Networks
We study a stochastic gossip model of continuous opinion dynamics in a society consisting of two types of agents: regular agents, who update their beliefs according to information that they receive from their social neighbors; and stubborn agents, who never update their opinions and might represent leaders, political parties or media sources attempting to influence the beliefs in the rest of th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: American Journal of Political Science
سال: 2012
ISSN: 0092-5853
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00620.x